منابع مشابه
International Health Regulations—What Gets Measured Gets Done
The global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome highlighted the need to detect and control disease outbreaks at their source, as envisioned by the 2005 revised International Health Regulations (IHR). June 2012 marked the initial deadline by which all 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member states agreed to have IHR core capacities fully implemented for limiting the spread of public he...
متن کاملSoftware Process Improvement: What gets measured gets done
A software quality management system (QMS) has been designed in a democratic fashion by programmers and has been approved by management. In order to motivate the programmers in following their own standards, measurement feedback is used for creating social pressure (peer pressure and management pressure). In nine out of ten cases this approach has been successful. Could the failure of the tenth...
متن کامل‘What gets measured gets managed’: revisiting the indicators for maternal and newborn health programmes
BACKGROUND The health of women and children are critical for global development. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda and the Global Strategy for Women's, Children's, and Adolescent's Health 2016-2030 aim to reduce maternal and newborn deaths, disability, and enhancement of well-being. However, information and data on measuring countries' progress are limited given the variety of meth...
متن کاملWhat gets measured, gets changed: evaluating law and policy for maximum impact.
21 Does law matter regarding public health outcomes? Regardless of what one may think about the answer to this age-old question, in recent years the public health community has increasingly demonstrated and recognized the roles that public health laws and policies play in effectuating longlasting and broad-based population-wide changes.1 Public health laws and policies have been instrumental in...
متن کاملEquity in HTA: what doesn’t get measured, gets marginalised
When making recommendations about the public funding of new health technologies, policy makers typically pay close attention to quantitative evidence about the comparative effectiveness, cost effectiveness and budget impact of those technologies - what we might call "efficiency" criteria. Less attention is paid, however, to quantitative evidence about who gains and who loses from these public e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing
سال: 2003
ISSN: 1479-1862
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740095